The Curse of the Conflict Minerals in the Congo July 5th, 2017 | Russian Television (RT)
Superb video documentary! (52 minutes) Close-up look at the history and struggles of the Congolese people working in the mines to produce the digital technology of the West.
Just about all our digital technology – mobile phones, laptops, batteries, etc.- require what are termed “rare minerals” in order to function optimally. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is particularly rich in some of these minerals. In the last two decades, thousands of mines have cropped up across the Congo, and hundreds of thousands of workers – including children – live, mine, and export these minerals under very harsh, slave labor conditions.
The production of our electronic technologies has fueled war, murder, rape, and child labor in the Congo. Here’s how.
Though one of the poorest countries in the world, the Democratic Republic of Congo is one of the richest in minerals needed for our digital technology. According to a lengthy 2011 report by the organization Free the Slaves, the average worker in the Congo earns about $1 a day, and yet the country’s untapped mineral resources have an estimated value of $24 trillion. Having endured over 125 years of one unstable regime after another, the Congolese people have been unable to form a stable government and build social and political institutions. Great natural resources, along with the absence of a functioning government, are an open invitation to corruption and violence from surrounding countries and others who want a piece of the wealth.
Realizing there is great profit to be gained from these much-coveted minerals, rebel militias in the Congo took control of nearly all the mines. As reported in the Guardian “…either the militia control mines and force people to work in them or these rebel groups demand ‘taxes’ from workers.” Congolese workers flock to the mines in the hope of finding work to provide for their basic needs. But with a percentage of mined minerals seized and sold illegally by militias, and the workers taxed above and beyond this, workers are often left destitute and without adequate resources to leave, and thus remain trapped there.
Illegal minerals – minerals that have not been tagged – are smuggled out of the country where they are sold to smelters. Once processed, the minerals are then resold to tech companies for use in the production of our digital devices. Money obtained from the sale of smuggled minerals, illegal taxes exacted from workers, and proceeds from captured and raped women sold back to their communities, provide rebel soldiers with funds to purchase yet more weapons. And the cycle of war and corruption goes on – while we, in the west, turn a blind eye to the violence behind a booming industry that fuels our economy and our fancies.
A BBC News article, DR Congo: Cursed by its natural wealth reports,
“Forcibly conscripted child soldiers corralled armies of slaves to dig for minerals such as coltan, a key component in mobile phones, the latest obsession in the developed world, while annihilating enemy communities, raping women and driving survivors into the jungle to die of starvation and disease.”
The article then goes on to explain:
“The billions of pounds those minerals have generated have brought nothing but misery and death to the very people who live on top of them, while enriching a microscopic elite in the Congo and their foreign backers, and underpinning our technological revolution in the developed world.”
According to World Without Genocide at the Mitchell Hamline School of Law, approximately 6 million have died as a result of the conflict, and about 45,000 more die each month. Frank Paulsen, director of Blood on the Mobile, noted, “In this place [the Congolese mine where he was filming], people die so we can get mobile phones.” Children and women also suffer – Unicef estimates that in 2016, there were about 40,000 children working in mines across the Congo. Hundreds of thousands of women have been raped and sold back to their villages for ransom – these are casualties of a war financed primarily by the electronics industry.
Moreover, even in mines which are no longer controlled by rebel militias – and thus considered “conflict-mineral free” – the condition of workers remains extremely harsh. In a 2015 article from The Daily Mail, Nick Fagge reported on the Luwow mine in the Congo, which was by then a conflict-free mine:
“Despite the importance of the mineral to the global multi-billion pound mobile phone industry, the miners – who toil away under the hot sun day after day – earn $5 a day for a 12-hour day for this backing-breaking work, the minimum wage is $3 a day.”
Something’s gone awry:
The untold suffering of children working on one end of the earth is enabling children on the other end to waste hours each day immersed in computer games or entrapped in the snares of social media. The rape of thousands of women on one end of the earth, has been complicity accepted, so that parents on the other end of the earth can use IoT parental-replacement-technologies such as robots or “smart” baby monitors to lessen the stresses of first world child-rearing. Millions on one end of the earth have died, so that millions on the other end of the earth can fill their homes with unnecessary wireless gadgets that contribute to illness and chronic health conditions. Something has gone terribly awry here.
One can only wonder what kind of havoc billions of new Internet-connected “things” will wreak on the longstanding instability and violence in the Congo and on the temptation to exploit workers even in conflict-free mines in order to produce “affordable” technologies.
If there were to be an end to the on-going violence and horrors in the Congo fueled by conflict minerals, it would likely drive up the cost of minerals, making our digital electronics less affordable. Can the Internet of Things be produced without reliance on conflict minerals and the exploitation of Congolese workers? Will warlords that have enabled our digital technology for two decades be an integral part of our IoT? Is there any hope for a resolution when we, in the west, may have to settle for less? What will our industries and government choose — social justice or economic growth? Peace in the Congo or prosperity in the west? What will we choose?
On April 7th, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced it would be scaling beck the tiny bit of legislation we currently have in the US to address the problem of conflict minerals in our technology – Section 1502 of the Dodd-Frank Bill. http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1792WX