Written statement submitted by Planetary Association for Clean Energy, Inc. a non-governmental organization in special consultative status.
By Olivier Vuillemin Feb. 11th, 2019 (Links to statement and references can be found below)
Olivier Vuillemin is an entrepreneur with a background in innovation management. He has been suffering from Radio Frequency – Electromagnetic radiation poisoning since 2004. Among other things, he spent the better part of the past decade involved as an independent expert at the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), International Telecommunications Union (ITU) and International Standards Organization (ISO) on topics related to healthcare metrology, telebiometrics and environmental metrology. He currently serves as main UN representative for the Planetary Association for Clean Energy in Geneva (UNOG), Vienna (UNOV) and New York (UNHQ).
This document was submitted to the UN Human Rights Council on February 11th 2019 from the perspective of human subjects experiments and Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as cited in the preamble of UNGA Resolution 39/46. It seems that this is the first time ever since the signature of this treaty that anyone has used this mechanism in this specific way. The precedent is the doctor’s trial at Nüremberg.
From the legal perspective, this document was worked on by lawyers specialized in international law, environmental law and human rights law which included veterans at the UNHRC. It was peer-reviewed and commented upon by 25 scientists and medical doctors who also participated in the development of its 89 pages of references.
This is a valid UN work document which was established and submitted within its legal framework. Due to its unequivocal stance on the degree of conflicts of interests at the WHO, ITU, IEC, ICNIRP, SCENHIR and others, it was obvious from day one that neither the Special Rapporteurs nor the High Commissioner of the UNHRC would discuss its explosive content. Although polite, this document says that every UN sister organization who has a say on the topic of EMR is basically willingly and knowingly plagued with conflicts of interests. These organizations are not only accomplices but play the lead role in this cover-up. Five Special Rapporteurs were contacted (environment, toxic waste, rights of handicapped people, rights of children, inhuman and degrading treatments) to no avail except a brief discussion with the SR on Toxic Waste’s assistant.
The Federal government is once again trying to strip away local authority over cell towers siting. Senators John Thune (R-SD) and Brian Schatz (D-HI) introduced the STREAMLINE Small Cell Deployment Act (S.3157)
S.3157 is an effort to make Congressional law consistent with recent FCC actions. In 2017 and 2018, Telecom managed to get the FCC to pass sweeping regulations that strip municipalities of local zoning rights and greatly cut back environmental and historic reviews.
Following you will find further information about the bill and actions you can take to oppose it:
The National League of Cities (NLC) opposes S. 3157. They wrote, “Despite urging from NLC and other local government advocates during the bill’s drafting phase, many preemptive provisions remain in the bill, including limiting the actions local governments can take on small cell wireless facility siting in an effort to make deployments cheaper, faster, and more consistent across jurisdictions.”
Please take a moment to do one or all of the following:
Call your Federal representatives. If on the Senate Commerce Committee, please ask them to put a hold on S 3157.
“I’m calling to ask the (Senator or Representative) to please protect our rights and our property by prohibiting telecom companies from placing wireless transmitters all over our neighborhoods with no local review. We have the right to determine how to integrate technology into our own community. Telecom companies should not be allowed to override local control. Please do not allow S. 3157 or any other 5G bills to pass.”
PLEASE NOTE: The NLC opposes Federal control of small cell deployment, but does NOT mind small cells regulated by municipalities. So instead of using the NLC generated letter, which has statements in support of small cells, either
craft your own letter
copy and paste the following text into their letter template
As a constituent, I am writing to express my opposition to the “Streamlining The Rapid Evolution And Modernization of Leading-edge Infrastructure Necessary to Enhance (STREAMLINE) Small Cell Deployment Act” (S. 3157).
S. 3157 is similar to a California bill (SB 649) which would have created a state mandated system of cell towers and eliminated local review and safety oversight. SB 649 was opposed by 300 cities, 47 counties and over 100 community, planning, health, environment and justice organizations. SB 649 was vetoed SB 649 by Governor Brown on October 15, 2017.
The threat of public and environmental harm from wireless radiation is real and growing. Local control is needed to ensure community safety, welfare and compliance with federal, state, and local laws.
Peer-reviewed published science shows wireless radiation harms public health and nature. Health effects include: fatigue, headaches, sleep problems, anxiety, ringing in the ears, heart problems, learning and memory disorders, increased cancer risk, and more. Children, the ill, and the elderly are more vulnerable.
International independent scientists are calling for biologically-based public exposure standards and reducing wireless radiation.
S. 3157 represents a direct affront to traditionally-held local authority. S. 3157 introduces an unnecessary, one-size-fits-all preemption of local jurisdiction. The bill also imposes unfair and inappropriate timelines on local governments.
For more information see this joint letter to Congress asking you to oppose any and all bills related to 5G and wireless radiation expansion: http://emfsafetynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Letter-to-Congress-2017-1.pdf
(Sign your name)
Resources from Environmental Health Trust for Policy Makers:
Become Acquainted with Grassroots Environmental Education:
Doug and Patti Wood and the Grassroots Environmental Education team, are spear-heading an effort to bring together the organizations and individuals around the country who are working to oppose 5g. Please check out the following links put out by Grassroots Environmental Education as well as the suggested actions: 1. Short video clip on 5g: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3u7k-7msciM&feature=share 2. The prior video will lead you to the website, https://www.telecompowergrab.org There you will find instructions for urging senators to NOT MOVE ON ANY BILLS RELATED TO 5G AND WIRELESS EXPANSION until after the election. 3. You will also see a link to the Grassroots Environmental Education website, Wireless Information Network (WIN), http://www.win19.org/ Wireless Information Network (WIN) is an excellent resource for up-to-date information about the harms of wireless radiation and what we can do to oppose 5g. At the website, people can also sign up for the WIN ListServe which is intended for individuals and organizations to share their research, ideas and experience. Here is the link to the WINListServe: http://www.win19.org/listserv.html
Here is a link to two strong Letters to the Editor re S.3157
Senator John Thune (R-SD) is the Commerce Committee Chairman. Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) is the Ranking Member.
Contact Information for the Committee Full Committee Office Majority: 202-224-1251 Majority Address: 512 Dirksen Senate Building; Washington DC, 20510 Minority: 202-224-0411
MAJORITY MEMBERS: 1. CHAIRMAN: Senator John Thune, South Dakota Washington D.C. Office United States Senate SD-511 Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-2321 Fax: (202) 228-5429 Toll-Free: 1-866-850-3855 EMAIL FORM: https://www.thune.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact
2. Senator Roger Wicker Mississippi Washington, D.C. 555 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Main: (202) 224-6253 Fax: (202) 228-0378 EMAIL FORM https://www.wicker.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact
3. Senator Roy Blunt Missouri Washington, D.C. 260 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-5721 EMAIL CONTACT FORM: https://www.blunt.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact-roy
4. Senator Ted Cruz Texas WASHINGTON, D.C. (202) 224-5922 404 Russell Washington, DC 20510 EMAIL: https://www.cruz.senate.gov/?p=form&id=16
5. Senator Deb Fischer Nebraska Washington D.C. 454 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-6551 Fax: (202) 228-1325 EMAIL: https://www.fischer.senate.gov/public/?p=email-deb
6. Senator Jerry Moran Kansas Washington, D.C. Dirksen Senate Office Building Room 521 Washington, D.C. 20510 Phone: (202) 224-6521 Fax: (202) 228-6966 https://www.moran.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/e-mail-jerry
7. Senator Dan Sullivan Alaska WASHINGTON, D.C. 702 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202)-224-3004 Fax: (202)-224-6501 https://www.sullivan.senate.gov/contact/email 8. Senator Dean Heller Nevada Washington, DC 324 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: 202-224-6244 Fax: 202-228-6753 https://www.heller.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/contact-form
9. Senator Jim Inhofe Oklahoma (site down)
10. Senator Mike Lee Utah (site down)
11. Senator Ron Johnson Wisconsin 328 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-5323 Fax: (202) 228-6965 https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/email-the-senator
12. Senator Shelley Moore Capito West Virginia 13 Senator Cory Gardner Colorado Washington, D.C. 354 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 P: (202) 224-5941 F: (202) 224-6524 https://www.gardner.senate.gov/contact-cory/email-cory
14. Senator Todd Young Indiana (site down)
1. Ranking Member Bill Nelson Florida WASHINGTON, DC OFFICE United States Senate 716 Senate Hart Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: 202-224-5274 Fax: 202-228-2183 https://www.billnelson.senate.gov/contact-bill
2. Senator Maria Cantwell Washington Washington, DC 511 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Phone: (202) 224-3441 Fax: (202) 228-0514 https://www.cantwell.senate.gov/contact/email
3. Senator Amy Klobuchar Minnesota Washington, DC 302 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 phone: 202-224-3244 fax: 202-228-2186 https://www.klobuchar.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/email-amy
4. Senator Richard Blumenthal Connecticut https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/contact Washington D.C. 706 Hart Senate Office Bldg. Washington, DC, 20510 tel (202) 224-2823 fax (202) 224-9673
5. Senator Brian Schatz Hawaii 722 HART SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20510 PHONE: (202) 224-3934 FAX: (202) 228-1153 https://www.schatz.senate.gov/contact
6. Senator Ed Markey Massachusetts Washington, D.C. 255 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 202-224-2742 https://www.markey.senate.gov/contact
7. Senator Tom Udall New Mexico Washington/Capitol Hill 531 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC, 20510 (202) 224-6621 https://www.tomudall.senate.gov/contact/email-tom
8. Senator Gary Peters Michigan Hart Senate Office Building Suite 724 Washington, DC 20510 (202) 224-6221 https://www.peters.senate.gov/contact/email-gary
9. Senator Tammy Baldwin Wisconsin (site down)
10. Senator Tammy Duckworth Illinois (site down)
11. Senator Maggie Hassan New Hampshire (site down)
12. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto Nevada (site down)
Armed Officers Arrest and Jail Woman to Enforce“Smart” Meters
PALMETTO ELECTRIC GETS ARMED THUGS AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE TO FORCE THEIR POOR CHOICE OF METERS
Bluffton, South Carolina, February 19, 2018 A Sheriff arrested and jailed a woman after she had a smart meter on her home changed to an analog meter due to health issues from the radiation. The arrest warrant for Elizabeth Michelle Mancini states that Palmetto Electric Cooperative, Inc., did not approve the meter, and could not read it.
Ms. Mancini, a Technical Writer with no criminal record, stated, “Palmetto did not, and could not rebut my affidavit of claims related to their having put an unsafe and invasive meter on my home. I didn’t violate any law because I was simply acting in self-defense against an unsafe and unlawful meter.” She said she had no intent to defraud the utility company, and that “Utilities have been able to read analog meters for over 70 years–a third grader can do it.”
Ms. Mancini began requesting Palmetto to remove their smart meter in 2015, to protect her health and her Fourth Amendment right to privacy in the home. Ms. Mancini described going through an administrative process, serving the CEO of the power company with a “Notice and Demand,” and a subsequent “Notice of Default,” prior to installing a safe, hardwired analog meter. She returned the smart meter, undamaged, to the CEO of Palmetto and included photos of all readings for meter reading purposes, and to show she was not attempting to defraud the company.
Armed officers came to her home and made the arrest.
“Most of us are being harmed by excessive radiation, but only a small percentage of the population are clinically sensitive to radio frequencies. There was no compelling public interest to strip search and shackle me, and there is no public benefit to my prosecution. These so-called smart meters are a profitable fraud. The crime is Palmetto’s gross negligence regarding the health effects from these meters and also the violation of our right to privacy within the home. They are simultaneously harming and spying on trusting, innocent customers under the guise of delivering the most basic human needs.”
Ms. Mancini made recordings of the police when they invaded her home, but law enforcement scrubbed the recordings.
“I hope my arrest will help lead to people joining together to refuse this technology. Easements are not open ended and do not include the forcing of a radiation emitting surveillance device,” she said. Ms. Mancini has requested a continuance of a hearing scheduled.
Yesterday, on February 19th, a resident of SC, E. Michelle Mancini, was arrested for refusing to have a wireless “smart” meter installed on her home. Ms. Mancini is suffering from Microwave Sickness – i.e. sickness from wireless radiation (just like I do).
Putting a wireless meter that emits non-stop pulsed microwave radiation on a home of a person with Microwave Sickness is like putting sugar in the water of a person with diabetes.
To the best of my legal understanding, forcing on Ms. Mancini a device that will cause her harm is criminal assault.
I would like to receive General Wilson’s response to this arrest.
I also would like to ask him to do the right thing and intervene and make sure that Ms. Mancini would not be forced to have a “smart” meter on her house and that no further action be taken against her. If anything, the executives of a company that is forcing a harmful device on people in their home should be the ones arrested and charged, not those who object to the assault.
Please be aware that in more than half of the states in the US people are allowed to opt-out from having a “smart” meter on their home. Therefore, refusing to allow people to opt-out from the installation of a “smart” meter is also a violation of the Commerce Clause.
Please also inform General Wilson that the results of the biggest Federal study on wireless radiation were published this month and the study confirmed not only that this radiation causes cancer, but that it also breaks the DNA. These findings are contrary to the long-held false belief that non-ionizing radiation cannot break DNA. Thereby this study refutes the wireless industry’s stance, as well as the FCC’s stance, that there are no biological and health effects.
How is it that a company is allowed to force on a woman, in her home, a wireless meter that can break her DNA and cause cancer, especially when she is already sick from this radiation?
Following is the Press Release for this disturbing incident.
I look forward to receiving General Wilson’s response.
The following Letter by Dr. Ronald N. Kostoff was written to the Montgomery County Zoning Committee. Dr. Kostoff strongly admonishes the County to protect public rights even when these are in conflict with Federal law – in this case, with Section 704 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. The arguments presented in this letter are compelling and should be brought before every public official making decisions relating to the deployment of 4G/5G “small” cells.
On the Montgomery County Government page that presents the Zoning Text Amendment, it is stated:
“Many residents have expressed concern about the health effects of radio frequency (RF) emissions. Under federal law, the County may not “regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the [FCC’s] regulations concerning such emissions.” In other words, the County may enforce and require compliance with FCC regulations, but not create additional requirements.”
In my view, it is an abdication of the Council’s responsibility to hide behind a ‘federal law’, if adherence to that law could bring harm to the residents of Montgomery County. For example, consider the Holocaust Encyclopedia (https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005681). It lists tens, if not hundreds, of “federal laws” implemented in Nazi Germany against its Jewish citizens, starting in 1933. If you were a member of a German County Council in the 1933-1940 time frame, would you be comfortable with such laws? More specifically, would you be sending out a letter to the residents of that County telling them they have no choice but to obey and implement such laws?
That example is very analogous to the situation today with respect to implementation of small cell towers to support 5G. We know radiofrequency emissions (RF) are harmful in isolation, and potentially very harmful when combined with other toxic stimuli. I showed many examples of harm from RF (in isolation and especially in combination with other toxic stimuli) in my book chapter that I circulated to the Council in my previous mailing (http://stip.gatech.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/371048_1_En_4_Chapter_OnlinePDF.pdf).
How harmful? We don’t know.
Our chapter showed a plethora of potentially fatal and chronic diseases that could result from RF radiation. But, even the human effects data (horrific as it was) was based on relatively short-term exposure to RF, such as cell phones, cell towers, WiFi. We know that many diseases, such as cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, etc, can have very long latency periods for some toxic stimuli. Intense exposures to RF are relatively recent, and we don’t have the long-term human data (in isolation or in combinations) to ascertain the full extent of the damage these exposures can cause. I cannot rule out that the potential damage from these long-term exposures would not equal, or even greatly exceed, the horrific damage caused by the Holocaust, especially because of the potential world-wide implementation of small cell tower 5G technology. That’s why I draw the analogy above, even though the Holocaust had strong racial motivations, while the motivations for RF-5G implementation are profit and greed. It is small comfort for the victims to know that they died from someone’s greed rather than racial motivations!
JAPANESE-AMERICAN INTERNMENT DURING WWII
On 19 February 1942, President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066, authorizing internment of tens of thousands of citizens of Japanese ancestry and resident aliens from Japan. That was essentially a Federal law. We view it from today’s perspective as horrific, and I have yet to see someone in recent times who would defend it. But, at the time, it was accepted by the majority of non-Japanese Americans. Should we have followed that proclamation blindly, as we did, causing undue hardship and disruption for a group whose only ‘crime’ was being of a particular ancestry? And, how is today’s action by the Montgomery County Council different from the actions of those authorities seventy-five years ago who went along with, and hid behind, an obviously harmful Federal Order?
Sanctuary cities limit their cooperation with the Federal government in enforcing Federal immigration law. In Maryland, three counties are listed as sanctuary counties: Baltimore, Prince George’s, and–Montgomery. Whether one agrees with their resistance or not, the officials (and residents) of these counties are willing to disobey Federal law because they think it is wrong.
So, for Montgomery County in particular, why are the officials willing to disobey Federal laws on immigration, but hide behind the cover of Federal law when it comes to the implementation of the infrastructure for 5G? Are the consequences of obeying Federal immigration law more serious than the consequences of obeying Federal telecommunications law?
I would argue the opposite. While the consequences of obeying Federal immigration law will result in substantial hardship and disruption of their lives for the individuals affected, for most the consequences will not be life-threatening. The consequences of obeying Federal telecommunications law have the potential of resulting in many severe illnesses and premature deaths. In short, the Council has shown willingness to disobey Federal law in the immigration situation, but unwillingness to do the same in the telecommunication situation.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
One reason for the schizophrenic behavior of the Council on the above problems of immigration and telecommunications infrastructure could be related to potential conflicts of interest. For the telecommunications implementation issue, have the Council members been vetted for conflict of interest? This would include: 1) any elements of their investment portfolio that would profit from operation and expansion of the mobile telecommunications network; 2) any elements of their present business endeavors that would profit from operation and expansion of this network; 3) any elements of pensions received that would profit from operation and expansion of this network; 4) any proposals in the pipeline or being considered that would profit from operation and expansion of this network; 5) any other existing or potential conflicts of interest by which they could profit from operation and expansion of the mobile telecommunications network. Anyone conflicted should be required to recuse themselves from decision-making on this network.
We are at a critical point in the fight to restrict exposure to very harmful levels of wireless radiation. Already, studies have shown extensive human damage resulting from the previous generations of mobile telecommunications networks. Implementation of 5G would raise potential human damage to unprecedented levels, because of the vastly increased density of cell towers required and their proximity to humans.
We need to make a stand: not tomorrow, not in some other location, but here, in Montgomery County, and now, in 2018! If Montgomery County can claim sanctuary status for immigration, they can certainly claim sanctuary status to be free from the potentially ravaging effects of 5G. Let’s not do the equivalent of making the trains to the Camps run on time, or of sending innocent people to internment facilities, as we did seventy-five years ago. Let’s do what is right, for once, and oppose installation of these 5G cell towers!
Telecom begs (buys?) government officials – say they need more towers to “meet public demand.”
Laws are enacted to speed the build-out of towers and antennas.
Our rights are diminished, we have less of a say.
Towers crop up and life moves on.
And the cycle begins once again ad fin-i-tum.
Consumption spirals upward, while the well-being of humans, wildlife, and our precious Earth spirals downward. Profits go up, while quality of life goes down. And many of us are left longing for a taste of the way our soul knows and wants things to be.
The current and aggressive push by the Telecom industry for wireless “small” cells is much like an ambitious start-up company that builds a huge warehouse hoping they will some day “grow into it”. 5g “small” cells are being put in place to “house” the hoped for massive explosion in wireless data that will be generated from the Internet of Things (IoT). Once the infrastructure is established, the sky is the limit for what new gadgets and applications the private sector can dream up to fill the airwaves, collect our data, and dangle before a largely, tech-addicted and uninformed public.
From predictions of Artificial Intelligence surpassing and destroying humans, to health and environmental impacts worsening due to the huge increase in wireless radiation. From cyber attacks on the grid now inevitable, to the exponential increase in electronic waste as every discarded “thing” makes its way to the ranks of e-waste — The future looks bleak.
Can we forge a different path forward? Can we write a different story? I would like to believe so. But we will need to approach this from four angles simultaneously:
1. Educate the public about the true costs of 5g and the Internet of Things
The true costs of 5g, and its partner in crime, the IoT, include
Health, from the soup of harmful wireless radiation we will be immersed in 24/7, due to “small” cells, and all the Internet connected “things”, devices, appliances, sensors, machines, robots, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence…and let’s not forget microchipped humans and animals.
Cyber Security, with estimates ranging from $6-11 trillion for the cost of trying to secure an ever changing, and impossible-to-secure IoT
Privacy, from every Internet connected “thing,” device, appliance, sensor, machine, robot, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, and microchipped humans and animals, collecting boatloads of our personal data to be shared with marketers, government, and law enforcement
Energy consumption, where the footprint from energy needed to produce and run all these wireless IoT products and platforms, will likely exceed the hoped for, and hyped about, energy saving technologies the IoT promises
E-waste, much of which is sent to the far East or Africa where it pollutes the air, water, and ground of remote villages, and where workers earn a dismal day’s pay by dismantling our toxic e-waste largely with the use of crude tools or by hand
Conflict minerals, which are used in nearly all our technology, and in the last 20 years, have contributed to the death of 5-6 million men, women and children from the Democratic Republic of Congo
There is a three-word phrase from the Hebrew Grace after meals that religious Jews recite after eating a full meal: “V’achalta, v’savata, ou v’rachta,” which roughly translates as “And you shall eat, and you shall be satiated, and you shall bless.” We must reawaken and cultivate in ourselves the notion of sweet satiation – the place of just enough – not one ounce too much, nor one iota too little…but perfectly enough. Then as we go about our days “consuming” food, experiences, relationships, and all that life has to offer, we may feel less of an urge to take more than we need.
3. Redefine “progress”
As we settle into the sweet point of satiation, our notion of progress can then gently find its way from more, faster, bigger and new, to kinder, more abiding, deeper, and more fulfilling.
4. Know there are safer and more wholesome alternatives
We can envision a better tomorrow than what industry is presenting today. Fiber is faster, safer, consumes at least 25 times less energy, and is far more cyber secure than wireless. If we shift to using fiber for the vast majority of our Internet and Telecommunications needs – thus relegating cellphones to short, on-the-go communications, and emergency response where needed – we will be removing or lessening the impacts of almost all the downsides of 5g and the IoT. By so doing, we not only protect ourselves, our families, and our environment, but we will get the added benefit of becoming reacquainted with ourselves, others, and the present moment.
If we stay the course and demand safe technology, industry and government will have no choice but to deliver. And we will once again reclaim our treasured and sacred inheritance of true connection and Presence.